Kempf v. Magida, 116 A.D.3d 736, 982 N.Y.S.2d 916 (2d Dep’t 2014)

The court affirmed the denial of defendant’s motion for summary judgment seeking to dismiss clients’ legal malpractice claim, finding that defendant failed to demonstrate, with admissible evidence, that clients could not prove at least one of the essential elements of their claim.